S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard Forum Index S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Inverse Laplace

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard Forum Index -> Other Topics in Advanced Mathematics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jddipqd
S.O.S. Newbie


Joined: 12 Sep 2003
Posts: 2
Location: Belgrade, SCG

PostPosted: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:17:15 UTC    Post subject: Inverse Laplace Reply with quote

I need to find the inverse Laplace of the following function:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Max Power
Member


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 43
Location: Vantaa

PostPosted: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 11:59:23 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

One way to do this is to use the well known Bromwich Integral for the Inverse Laplace transformation, but it demands some work to be done:

Where is chosen so that every singularity of
is on the left hand side of the line .
Then if is a meromorphic function (analytic everywhere but in a finite set of points and with no essential singularities) on the left hand side of that line (on the complex plane), then you can calculate this integral (relatively) easily using contour integration (ie. extend the line to an infinite semicircle on the left (since e^zt has an essential singularity on the right) and voilá, you have solved the problem.

In order to compute the contour integral you have to find the singularities (in the case of a meromorphic function they are poles of finite order) and calculate their residues.

A complex function has an m-order pole at iff.

So for example has a first order (or simple) pole at .

Then if a complex function has a m-order pole at then the residue at that point is:


And the theory of contour integration states that
where B is an area in the complex plane is its boundary, nRes = the number of poles within B and is a finite order pole.

Now your function
has two third order poles at (or one third order at the origin when ) so the contour integration gives

and of course

And the rest is up to you. (I Don't have the time to compute the derivatives since there is quite a lot of work in it, but you should be ok)
If you still have troubles then ask away and the proofs for the statements I made above can be found in any advanced book on complex calculus.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard Forum Index -> Other Topics in Advanced Mathematics All times are UTC
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Contact Us | S.O.S. Mathematics Homepage
Privacy Statement | Search the "old" CyberBoard

users online during the last hour
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005-2010 phpBB Group.
Installation and all modifications: H. Knaust
Copyright © 1999-2010 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA