 |
S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bitupon S.O.S. Oldtimer

Joined: 18 Jul 2005 Posts: 164 Location: Golaghat, Assam, India.
|
Posted: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:25:33 UTC Post subject: Theory of equations. |
|
|
Question: Solve 27(x^4)-195(x^3)+494(x^2)-520x+192=0, the roots being
in G.P
My Solution:-Since the equation is of degree 4 therefore it will have
four roots
Let the roots be a/(r^3),a/r,ar,a(r^3)
Then,
{a/(r^3)}+{a/r}+ar+a(r^3)=195/27=65/9
{(a^2)/(r^4)}+(a^2)+(a^2)(r^4)+(a^2)+{(a^2)/(r^2)}+(a^2)(r^2)=494/27
{(a^3)/(r^3)}+(a^3)(r^3)+(a^3)r+{(a^3)/r}=520/27
a^4=192/27=64/9
How to simplify from here onwards to arrive at the solutions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bugzpodder Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 2901
|
Posted: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:53:20 UTC Post subject: |
|
|
First of all, you shouldn't assume that the common ratio is r^2. The roots could after all be complex numbers, however, I largely suspect that this isnt the case in this situation.
Secondly, we can see its non-zero, since all four roots are non-zero, to justify division of r.
In either case, What you do is solve for the variable a from the last equation and plug it into one of the other equations. Verify all equations. _________________ Has anyone noticed that the below is WRONG? Otherwise this statement would be true:
where
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Soroban Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame
Joined: 19 May 2003 Posts: 7121 Location: Lexington, MA
|
Posted: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:36:36 UTC Post subject: Re: Theory of equations. |
|
|
Hello, Bitupon!
| Quote: | Solve , the roots being in G.P |
We have: .
If the roots are
Let the roots be:
Then: . . (1)
And: .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . . . (2)
We should be able to solve (1) and (2) for and
. . but I haven't done it yet . . .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I did, however, solve it with the Remainder Thereom.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Therefore, the roots are: . .with
. . . . . . or: . . with
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bugzpodder Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 2901
|
Posted: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:19:27 UTC Post subject: |
|
|
the last two equation factors
but i am betting that the original poster skipped a phrase: all roots must be real _________________ Has anyone noticed that the below is WRONG? Otherwise this statement would be true:
where
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jinydu Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame
Joined: 07 Nov 2004 Posts: 2988
|
Posted: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 06:04:39 UTC Post subject: |
|
|
I still don't see what's wrong with letting the common ratio be . What do non-real roots have to do with it?
The way I see it, Bitupon has used a bit of ingenuity to narrow down the possible values of a to only four possible values. He should be able to complete the problem by testing all four values in the other three equations until he arrives at a with a pair of values (a, r) that is consistent with the original quartic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|