S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard Forum Index S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Two Odd Balls

 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard Forum Index -> Miscellaneous
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dejavu34
Member


Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 05:31:20 UTC    Post subject: Two Odd Balls Reply with quote

You have a balance scale and X balls. All of these balls are identical except two, which are heavier than the others by the same amount. You are only allowed to weigh a ball (or balls) against another ball (or balls).

If maximum six weighings will be enough for finding the odd balls, what can be the maximum value for X?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Denis
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame


Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 2572
Location: Ottawa Ontario

PostPosted: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:44:09 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

1=3, 2=4, 3=7, 4=10, 5=19, 6=28 (yours), 7=55, 8=82, 9=163 .....

w=weighings, n=number of balls
if w=even : n = 3^(w/2) + 1
if w= odd : n = 3^[(w - 1) / 2 + 1

When n=odd, the 1st weighing is 2 groups of (n-1)/2, leaving 1 aside:
this forces, in the scale=even case, to have only 1 possibility: a Heavy on both sides.

When working with w = even, I had convinced myself that this should be the case again,
since, at 1st weighing, an even number of balls gives 2 possible results instead of 1.

But I was getting nowhere with w=even: someone told me to use n=even,
and weigh instead 1/3 against 1/3 (leaving an extra one aside).

As example, in your 6 weighings case, 1st weighing is 9:9 leaving 10 aside.
Of course, for all w=even cases, then (n-1) must be a multiple of 3.
IF you ask me to type out the steps showing the 6 weighings taking care of
28 balls, the answer is: NO Shocked

By the way, the person who helped me out was not commutative Exclamation
_________________
I upped my standards, so up yours !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dejavu34
Member


Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:37:34 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know the answer is 30, but I don't know the solution for now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Denis
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame


Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 2572
Location: Ottawa Ontario

PostPosted: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:17:43 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

dejavu34 wrote:
I know the answer is 30, but I don't know the solution for now.

30 with 6 weighings? I wouldn't bet the farm on it Idea
_________________
I upped my standards, so up yours !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Denis
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame


Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 2572
Location: Ottawa Ontario

PostPosted: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:47:05 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmm....perhaps 30 IS possible in 6 weighings...

Can you do 12 balls in 4 weighings?
It can be done: just did it with some help.

So we need to reduce the 30 balls to 12 in the 1st 2 weighings...
haven't tried that yet: TRY IT!
_________________
I upped my standards, so up yours !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Denis
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame


Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 2572
Location: Ottawa Ontario

PostPosted: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:31:22 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

dejavu34 wrote:
I know the answer is 30, but I don't know the solution for now.

Well, the answer is NOT 30: it is higher than 30.
But sorry, can't give you the exact, since that problem
is part of a current puzzle competition; did you know that?
_________________
I upped my standards, so up yours !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Opalg
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame


Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Posts: 1399
Location: Leeds, UK

PostPosted: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:53:33 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

Denis wrote:
But sorry, can't give you the exact, since that problem
is part of a current puzzle competition; did you know that?

In that case, we shouldn't give any further hints for this particular problem. But I just wanted to point out that for general weighing problems of this sort there is a large amount of information available online. To get an idea of some of the techniques involved, look here or here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Denis
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame


Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 2572
Location: Ottawa Ontario

PostPosted: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:54:05 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, Opalg, but all those concern one ball only: much easier.
I don't think this one (2 heavier balls) is anywhere on the internet.
I had never seen it before.
_________________
I upped my standards, so up yours !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dejavu34
Member


Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 07:35:59 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

Denis wrote:
But sorry, can't give you the exact, since that problem
is part of a current puzzle competition; did you know that?


No, I don't know the competition you talked about.
One of my friends asked me this puzzle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Denis
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame


Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 2572
Location: Ottawa Ontario

PostPosted: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:12:31 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

dejavu34 wrote:
No, I don't know the competition you talked about.
One of my friends asked me this puzzle.

Well, your "friend" then is trying to get the answer to this competiton:

"You have a balance scale and X balls. All of these balls are identical except two, which are heavier than the others by the same amount. You are only allowed to weigh a ball (or balls) against another ball (or balls).
If maximum six weighings will be enough for finding the odd balls, what can be the maximum value for X?"

You posted the above: pretty well exactly the competition's wording.
_________________
I upped my standards, so up yours !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dejavu34
Member


Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:32:56 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

Denis wrote:
You posted the above: pretty well exactly the competition's wording.


I posted exactly all the words at my friend's e-mail. (one-to-one)
(for not writing again in vain and prevent the possible writing mistake/s...)
(Copy-Paste method...)

But, I didn't aware of the competition.
I have asked to my friend after your post...
He confirmed that it is a puzzle of a current competition.

So, sorry for this.

Thanks for your informing and all the post about my questions...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Denis
Member of the 'S.O.S. Math' Hall of Fame


Joined: 24 Jul 2005
Posts: 2572
Location: Ottawa Ontario

PostPosted: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 01:21:46 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is he/she still your friend ? Wink
_________________
I upped my standards, so up yours !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dejavu34
Member


Joined: 22 Sep 2007
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 06:51:52 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, she is my old friend from the school....
Actually, she is very kind person.

I can't change my relationship with her for this event....

But, of course, I will say her that this is not good behaviour.

Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
helmut
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Apr 2003
Posts: 1721
Location: El Paso TX (USA)

PostPosted: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:13:49 UTC    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a question from a math competition. Topic has been closed. User dejavu34 has been banned.
_________________
The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark. - Michelangelo Buonarroti
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard Forum Index -> Miscellaneous All times are UTC
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Contact Us | S.O.S. Mathematics Homepage
Privacy Statement | Search the "old" CyberBoard

users online during the last hour
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005-2009 phpBB Group.
Installation and all modifications: H. Knaust
Copyright © 1999-2009 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA