One shortcoming of Fourier series today known as the Gibbs phenomenon was first observed
by H. Wilbraham in 1848 and then analyzed in detail by Josiah W. Gibbs (1839-1903).
We will start with an example.
Example. Consider the function
Since this function is odd, we have an = 0, for .
A direct calculation gives
The Fourier partial sums of f(x) are
The main Theorem implies that this sequence converges to f(x) except at the point x0 = 0, which a point of discontinuity of f(x). Gibbs got interested to the behavior of the sequence of Fourier partial sums around this point.
Looking at the graphs of the partial sums, we see that a strange phenomenon is happening. Indeed, when x is close to the point 0, the graphs present a bump. Let us do some calculations to justify this phenomenon.
Consider the second derivative of f2n-1, which will help us find the maximum points.
Using trigonometric identities, we get
So the critical points of f2n-1 are
Since the functions are odd, we will only focus on the behavior to the right of 0. The closest critical point to the right of 0 is
In order to find the asymptotic behavior of the this sequence, when n is large, we will use the Riemann sums. Indeed, consider the function
on the interval ,
and the partition
So the Riemann sums
Esay calculations show that these sums are equal to
Using Taylor polynomials of
at 0, we get
i.e. up to two decimals, we have
These bumps seen around 0 are behaving like a wave with a height equal to 0,18. This is not the case only for this function. Indeed, Gibbs showed that if f(x) is piecewise smooth on
and x0 is a point of discontinuity, then the Fourier partial sums will exhibit the same behavior, with the bump's height almost equal to
To smooth this phenomenon, we introduce a new concept called the -approximation. Indeed, let
f(x) be a function piecewise smooth on
and fN(x) its Fourier partial sums. Set
which are called the -factors. To see that the sequence of sums
better approximate the function f(x) than the Fourier partial sums
we use the following result:
Theorem. We have
Proof. We have
Similarly, we have
which yields the conclusion above.
Using the above conclusion, we can easily see that indeed the sums
approximate the function f(x) in a very smooth way. On the graphs, we can see that the Gibbs phenomenon has faded away.
Example. The picture
shows how the -approximation helps fade away the Gibbs phenomenon for the function
Note that in this case, we have
S.O.S MATH: Home Page
Do you need more help? Please post your question on our
S.O.S. Mathematics CyberBoard.
Author: M.A. Khamsi
Copyright © 1999-2017 MathMedics, LLC. All rights reserved.
Math Medics, LLC. - P.O. Box 12395 - El Paso TX 79913 - USA
users online during the last hour